Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffJonathan Aizen Date: Feb 24, 2003 10:13pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Flac vs. Shorten

There has been some serious discussion about why we can't do away with the MD5 files. The biggest reason is that without them there is no way to automatically know if files are missing from a file set.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffDiana Hamilton Date: Feb 24, 2003 10:34pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Flac vs. Shorten

Yeah, I would never class md5s as "pesky." Md5s are our friends. :)

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)